Generative AI is not just another technological evolution: it is an interruption of identity, experience and unwritten social contracts that shape the way people perceive their value in the workplace. According to my interview with Amy Loomis, vice president of research for the future of work at IDC, organizations must recognize that the adoption of GEN AI is not just about tools and processes. These are also people and adapt to new forms of work.
Many companies anxious to adopt Gen AI sometimes underestimate the resistance that does not arise from technical obstacles, but from psychological. Loomis shared that, although an increasing number of organizations, from 35% to 61% in just one year, in the morning, applying GEN AI for tasks such as assistance and recovery of information, Foot Fower is venturing into a more complex implex such as the AI of the agent. At the end of 2024, only 20% of IT leaders surveyed said they already widely used AI agents. That said, much more were using technologies in some specialized areas (28%) or doing a few initials (27%)
But the numbers are only part of the story. The deepest friction is within the workforce itself, particularly among experienced professionals who may feel that the value of the experience that has spent decades building. This is not a simple experience in insecurity; They are the IT leaders who have to navigate with new good technological faith. And according to Loomis, organizations that wish to succeed with generation AI must address that emotional truth in front.
Build skills where people are, not where you would like to be
Companies that because they exceed the reluctance of adopting solutions from Gen AI, particularly use agents or IA must first go beyond obsolete assumptions about learning. Traditional training, isolated from day -to -day workflows, is no longer sustainable. “Count some to take a duration duration of the duration of an hour simply does not work,” Loomis said.
On the other hand, the most effective organizations are integrating learning in the workflow through tools such as digital adoption platforms that guide users step by step in real time. This allows a right learning in time that does not demand more of the workers, already knows them where they are. Complementary strategies such as microlearning, experimental simulations with AR or VR and real -time metadata feedback loops help to create an ecosystem where learning becomes part of the realization.
And critically, it is not just about technical insight. Loomis emphasized that what many call “soft skills” should be understood with greater precision as essential human skills. In a world of genes, the ability to translate the human vision of indications, contextual understanding and ethical decisions is as crucial as coding. Skills such as flexibility, interdisciplinary thinking and emotional intelligence become differentiating.
Resistance is not always about fear, sometimes it is about pride
One of the most convincing ideas of Loomis of the interview is that the resistance to generation of generation AI is not always about the fear of loss of employment per se. It can be groups about the relevance perceived at the end of a career. An experienced developer who has spent decades dominating Java or managing inherited systems can worry about his perceived gene learning curve, despite the support of AI assistance and natural language coding capabilities.
“Nobody wants to look like a NOOBIE,” Loomis said. This ego -based resistance is not irrational, it is deeply human. Organizations must respond accordingly. That could mean sacrificing these individual tutoring roles, allowing them to caress their sense of professional status as they convey a valuable experience. It could mean identifying forms for them to administer inherited systems as well as new tools are adopted. It definitely means recognizing that some transitions require two steps back before a step forward, and it’s fine.
Creating a safe psychological culture is vital. People should feel that their value is not erased by the new technology, but is amplified through new opportunities. And for this to happen, the systems system must support that trip, with integrated roads for improvement that does not require sacrificing productivity or personal time.
Personalization is the new standard, and is exhausting
Gen AI differs from previous digital transformations in an important way: it does not come with a universal play book. Unlike the implementation of an ERP system or the adoption of Salesforce, GEN AI requires that companies deeply personalize use cases depending on the function, role and even individual workflows. And because technology is evolving so quickly, what does not work today can suddenly work tomorrow.
This creates a paradox. On the one hand, Gene AI promises a transformative productivity. On the other hand, it demands a relentless rhythm of adaptation. As Loomis explained, functions such as marketing, which tend to be more fluid and creative, have suffered a significant restructuring of accommodation. The roles have been bordered. New governance models have emerged.
On the contrary, departments with deterministic workflows, such as finance or acquisition, face a different child or transition, less radical in process but not less important in implementation. Ultimately, organizations must evaluate the “context level” or each role to determine where the AI gene can be integrated more effectively and what type of change management is required.
Let the governance guide innovation, not the restriction
One of the risks in navigation of this transformation is to balance too much towards the control and blocking of experimentation completely. However, as Loomis pointed out, “just because you can automatically something means that you should.” Governance is critical, but it must be fluid enough to evolve with technology.
The best practices that emerge from the field include the creation of a Center of Excellence of Gen AI that brings together interfunctional stakeholders to define and refine the governance parameters. This model allows organizations to identify which tools are authorized, what railings are necessary and, more importantly, to encourage and evaluate base innovation without losing control.
In addition, governance must take into account risk management. Safety, data privacy, hallucinations and rapid injection vulnerabilities are very real groups. But Loomis observed a curious trend: in practice, the fear of getting lost is more powerful than fear of failure. Companies are advancing anyway, in a captive, but determined way.
The risk of mitigating requires automation and human supervision. AI must be trained for flag deviations and rhythm operations when thresholds are violated. Simultaneously, employees must be equipped with adequate training to recognize and inform failures, intentionally or not, human behavior remains a significant risk vector.
The future: embedded, invisible interfaces and reinvented roles
Looking towards the future, Loomis sees that Gen Ai becomes an invisible layer of experience in the workplace, such as cloud computing today. Most employees won to think in terms of bots and agents; They will simply perform their work through orchestrated digital workflows. But the impact on labor roles will be deep.
New roles will emerge as AI coaches, ethics and workflow designers. The existing works will be redefined. Input level roles can be replaced by automation, creating a void in professional development that can only fill Ia tutors or integrated training systems. As the AI manages repetitive tasks, new hiring is expected to contribute at higher levels without traditional learning that increases the bar for initial performance and incorporation.
Loomis summarized it with a metaphor: “Organizations are like fish. They have to swim to stay alive.” In the AI generation era, that means evolving continuously through the development of inclusive skills, the management of ego -sensitive change, adaptive governance and a relentless approach to the incorporation of learning in the workflow.
Because in the end, overcome resistance is not mandates. This is meaning. And the leaders who understand that they will be those who will not only integrate the effective genes, but also build the son of resistant organizations and with a vision of the future that prosper in their path.
Have you read?
The best medicine schools in the world.
The best universities in the world.
The best international secondary schools in the world.
The best business schools in the world.
The best fashion schools in the world.
The best hospitality and hotel management schools in the world.
