A federal judge dismissed an antimonopoly demand on Monday that had been filed against the NCAA by several former university basketball players, including Kansas’s leading, Mario Chalmers, after his claims fell the statue or limitation.
The demand, which included 16 players in total who played before June 16, 2016, said that the NCAA had enriched using their names, images and similarities to promote their male basketball tournament. That date in 2016 is the earliest date for players that will be included in the V camera. ANTIMONOPOLIO AGREEMENT OF THE NCAA waiting for the final approval of a federal judge.
The United States District Judge, Paul Engelmayer, said a statute of four -year limitations for federal antitrust violations, despite the lawsuit telling that the law continues to be violated by the use of the NCAA of the null players in March Madness Promotion.
Chalmers reached a drawing of a tie with 2.1 seconds for Kansas in the game for the 2008 title against Memphis, a highlight that remains a basic element of the NCAA tournament packages. The Jayhawks get used to winning the championship in extra time.
“The use of the NCAA today of a null acquired decades ago, since the fruit of an antimonopoly violation does not constitute a new act of restart on the clock of limitations,” Engelmayer wrote in the decision of 34 pages. “On the other hand, as the NCAA argues, the contemporary use of a null reflects the performance of an elderly agreement: a contract between the student and the NCAA under which he acquired images and images of the plaintiff.”
[Related: NCAA passes rules to prepare schools to pay players directly]
Engelmayer also pointed out that the plaintiffs were part of the class in O’Bannon v. NCAA, the 2015 case that helped mark the age of null payments, so the demand was not demonstrated different from other established cases.
There are a number of other active demands filed against the NCAA on similar and null antitrust terrain. Former Villanova Wildcat Kris Jenkins, whose triple Timbre won the 2016 National Championship against North Carolina, presented one at the beginning of April on his own instead of one of the existing demands. As he told ESPN: “I feel that it is different from the [lawsuits]And the NCAA has shown that it is different from many other things that have happened in the past just because the magnitude of the shot, the shot, the financial gains for the NCAA and the rules of the orlands that they had a tofibede blade
The key to the case of Jenkins, that timbre of timbres that Villanova and the NCAA benefited from two months before the June 16, 2016 limit that dismissed the demand of Chalmers et al. However, Jenkins also plays the 2016-2017 season for Villanova as a last year student: if another judge will be entered into Engelmayer and will say that all this was part of an “agreement”, or that is a different case, it remains to be seen.
Associated Press contributed to this report.
Why great stories delivered directly to your entrance tray? Create or log in to your Fox Sports accountAnd follow the leagues, teams and players to receive a personalized bulletin every day!
Get more university basketball Follow your favorites to obtain information about games, news and more
